Data Driven Journalism: Student Directed Research Study

Topic

I will be researching the domestication of animals. I will be researching this topic because I like 
animals and I am interested in the topic and the history of it and really any aspect of it. I am also 
interested in the history of animal domestication.

Literature Review Question

 "What does the literature reveal about the domestication of animals?"

Research for Literature Review

In literature review and synthesis table.

Literature Review

Laudan Pouremad
Mr. Kefor
Journalism E
December 15, 2014

Animal Domestication

“The exercise of dominion over plants and animals is arguably the most consequential event in human history” (Ratliff). Humans have been domesticating animals for thousands of years. The dog was the first animal to be domesticated, from approximately “13,000 to 30,000 years ago” (Beam). Following the dog, humans began domesticating other animals, such as horses and chickens. Humans have spent generations domesticating animals for things like food, hunting skills, and companionship. Domestication is not a simple thing. It is a very long and complicated process, one that is done over generations. Domesticating on a genetic level is not quite the same as taming. It is not conditioning in animal to tolerate human contact, it is completely removing the animal’s wild instincts, so that the animal is dependent on humans to care for it. “The most significant impact of this intense selection for reduced wariness and low reactivity to external stimuli is seen in the size, organization, and function of the brains of domesticated animals” (Zeder). When an animal is domesticated, it is very different from its ancestors, even inside its brain.

Very far away from here, in the south of Siberia outside the city of Novosibirsk, (Ratliff) an experiment began over forty years ago. The goal of the experiment was to domesticate foxes. “And by "domesticated" I don't mean captured and tamed, or raised by humans and conditioned by food to tolerate the occasional petting. I mean bred for domestication, as tame as your tabby cat or your Labrador” (Ratliff). A biologist by the name of Dmitry Belyaev was the leader of a group of researchers at the Institute of Cytology and Genetics. They acquired 130 foxes from fur farms. “They then began breeding them with the goal of recreating the evolution of wolves into dogs” (Ratliff). They would keep producing generations of the foxes, and they would test the foxes to see how well they reacted to humans, and they would select “those most approachable to breed for the next generation.” Very quickly, they had produced foxes that were not only unafraid of humans, but were “actively seeking to bond with them” (Ratliff). “Domesticated animals are known to share a common set of characteristics. They tend to be smaller, with floppier ears and curlier tails than their untamed progenitors” (Ratliff). This makes them more “appealing” to humans. Traits like these are “sometimes referred to as the domestication phenotype” (Ratliff).

As the foxes were domesticated, they would begin to display aspects of the domestication phenotype. “Selecting which foxes to breed based solely on how well they got along with humans seemed to alter their physical appearance along with their dispositions. After only nine generations, the researchers recorded fox kits born with floppier ears” (Ratliff). Belyaev believed that these changes in the foxes were from a genotype that the foxes might share with species that could be domesticated. (Ratliff).

In order to study the “biology of tameness,” the scientists created a group of foxes opposite to that of the domesticated group. They would only breed the most “aggressive” foxes for the next generation. The new head of the experiment, Trut, uses a specific fox as an example. “You can see how aggressive she is. She was born to an aggressive mother but brought up by a tame mother” (Ratliff). This proved the point that the foxes’ behavior towards humans was “more nature” then it was “nurture.” (Ratliff). 

The first animal to be domesticated was the dog, although no one really knows exactly when it happened first. “No one can pinpoint exactly when humans first started keeping dogs as pets, but estimates range from roughly 13,000 to 30,000 years ago” (Beam). Archaeologists were able to tell dogs and wolves apart because of differences in the skeletons. “Dogs had smaller teeth, for example, and a reduced “Sagittal Crest,”-the bone ridge that runs down the forehead and connects to the jaw” (Beam). The earliest dog bones were discovered in Belgium, however, “ancient dog bones have also been unearthed in western Russia, near its border with Ukraine, and elsewhere across Europe, Asia, and Australia,” suggesting that the domestication of dogs was a “widespread Phenomenon” (Beam). Researchers believe that wolves were attracted to the early human settlements because of the garbage. “Those canines brave enough to approach humans, yet not so aggressive to attack, got fed” (Beam). These animals would get fed by the humans and become almost tame, and they would reproduce, and eventually, because of being fed by the humans instead of hunting and killing their own food, they did not need the “strong jaws and sharp teeth” of their “feral counterparts” (Beam). After this first step, humans began to breed them to help with things like hunting, helping with physical labor, herding, and even to be guard dogs. (Beam).

Other animals came after the dog. “Sheep and goats were first domesticated roughly 11,000 years ago” (Beam). Cats were domesticated a while after that, because the grain that people stored would attract mice, who would attract cats. (Beam). Around that time, people began to keep cows for food. “Several thousand years later, humans began using oxen, donkeys, and camels to transport goods. Horses were eventually domesticated for both riding and carrying goods” (Beam).

The “teaming up” of wolves and humans, for hunting, has benefits for the wolves, and benefits for the humans. “For the wolf, human ingenuity and the use of weapons mean a share in a greater number of skills. For humans, the wolf’s speed and ferocity is equivalent to a new weapon” (History world). Domestication was possibly unintentional on the human’s part, rather than purposefully breeding animals to be domesticated. “A particular puppy in the litter is favored because it has an attractive coat, barks well, is unusually friendly or obedient, noticeably large or small” (History world). That puppy that is favored will be more likely to be kept, and therefore will have puppies, and its likeable characteristics will be passed on. Works of art from Egypt, Assyria and Rome such as paintings, sculptures, and mosaics suggest that at the time of these civilizations there were already “many different shapes and sizes of dog” (History world.)

Sheep are the first animal known to have been domesticated for consumption, in the Middle East. “The proof is the high proportion of bones of one-year-old sheep discarded in a settlement at Shanidar” (History world). People would herd sheep and keep cattle for a constant supply of fresh meat. If they had to hunt it and more meat was brought back than could be eaten, the meat would go bad.

In conclusion, the domestication of animals is a very important part of humanity’s past, and knowledge on how it was done and if it can be done again are important to our future. Dogs made a huge contribution to humans, helping them as hunting dogs, watching over them, and definitely they were and are a wonderful source of companionship. Many other animals helped us in many different ways. They provided early humans with food, and provide us with it still, and they helped get us places in ancient times when we had no cars. Domestication is a very complicated process. “Domestication is attained by some combination of genetic changes occurring over generations and developmental mechanisms ( e.g., physical maturation, learning) triggered by recurring environmental events or management practices in captivity that influence specific biological traits” (Price). It takes a lot of hard work and time. Take the farm-fox experiment for example, that took many years to get going and although it showed results more quickly than expected, the process was still a hard one. Animal domestication is important because it shaped our society today in many ways, providing us with food, providing us with transportation, and providing us with protection. Its effects on our society today can be similar, depending on where you live or what type of animal you have, but for the most part, animals such as dogs, cats, and horses are kept because they are an excellent source of companionship and they bring people joy. 

Gap Identification/ Research Question

I found a lot of literature surrounding the domestication of animals about the process, its history, and
even an article that talks about a specific example of an animal domestication experiment. There was
definitely a lot of information about how it happened, why it is important and how it has affected us,
but i still wondered if anyone ever thought about it or knew anything about it and if so, what did they
think or know? My research question is: "What does the average teenager know/think about animal
domestication and its history?"

Methodology

    I will be collecting quantitative data for the study I conducted. According to 

BusinessDictionary.com, quantitative data is “data that can be quantified and verified, and is 

amendable to statistical manipulation.” I will use percentages to convey my data. Percentages are an 

example of quantitative data because they are numbers. Quantitative data is “information that can be 

measured and written down with numbers” (Shmoop.com) This makes sense for me because I 

surveyed a lot of people.

Research Methods

Data collection process and instrument

I created a survey to answer my research question. I distributed the survey to students at Norton High 

School, then collected them. My study instrument:

Name_______________________

Laudan Pouremad

Animal Domestication survey

Strongly Disagree      Disagree      Neutral/No Opinion   Agree   Strongly Agree

  1.  I think animal domestication is an important part of history. ____________________

 2. I am aware of the process of domestication when it first began. ____________________

3.   I do not know what the first animal to be domesticated was. ____________________

4.   I do not think people should do more work/research with animal domestication in the future. 

____________________

5.   I think people should try to domesticate more animals. ____________________

Sample population

My sample population were students at Norton High School. I surveyed twenty three of them.

Data analysis

For question 1, 4% disagreed, 22% were neutral, 52% agreed, and 22% strongly agreed. For question 

2, 4% strongly disagreed, 48% disagreed, 30% were neutral and 18% agreed. For question 3, 

4%strongly disagreed, 35% disagreed, 4% were neutral, 39% agreed and 18% strongly agreed. For 

question 4, 9% strongly disagreed, 43% disagreed, 30% were neutral, 13% agreed and 4% strongly 

agreed. For question 5, 26% disagreed, 35% were neutral, 13% agreed and 26% strongly agreed. 

Findings

  After analyzing my data, I found that the majority of the students I surveyed thought animal domestication was an important part of history. This helps answer my research question because it gives me an idea of what the students think about animal domestication, and for the most part they think it was an important part of history. I found that the majority of students disagreed or were neutral to question 2, and only a small number agreed. This tells me that the majority of high school students do not know a lot about animal domestication.  For question 3, do they know what the first animal to be domesticated was, it was almost even, but for the most part, they did not know what the first animal to be domesticated was. I found for question 4 that a lot of the students that I surveyed thought that people should do more work and research with animal domestication in the future. For question 5, the question of whether people should try to domesticate more animals, a lot of people had no opinion. As for those who did have opinions, more agreed than disagreed. That is what I found in my research.

Conclusion

Throughout this research endeavor, I have learned a lot about animal domestication. I have learned 

about its history, about its importance and what it has done for humans, and about how it is done. In my literature review, I wrote a lot about the farm-fox experiment in Siberia. That was a very interesting article. It told the story of an experiment to domesticate foxes in Russia, which was not easy when it first started. The people running the experiment got results very fast, with foxes seeking human attention instead of shying away. I also read and wrote about the history of domestication. The dog was the first animal to be domesticated, a very long time ago. Researchers believe that it was because wolves were attracted to the garbage the humans made, and they began to become more dependant on humans as time went by. Animal domestication has done a lot for humans in history and now. It provided humans with food when they began domesticating sheep and oxen, and it still provides us with food today. Dogs are a very important part of our society today; they provide us with love and companionship. In history, dogs used to help humans hunt. Having learned all that, I still needed my research question. My research question was “what does the average teenager know/think about animal domestication and its history?” I had certainly gained a lot of knowledge on the subject, and so I created a survey to see if other people knew anything about it or what they thought about it or even if they cared. Before this research project, I had really never put much thought into the subject, but now that I know more about it, I find it interesting how much of an impact it had on our lives and society. 

References

 Beam, Christopher. "Mans First Friend." Slate.com. the slate group, 6 Mar. 2009. Web. 12 Dec. 2014

"History Of The Domestication Of Animals." History World. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 Dec. 2014

Ratliff, Evan. "Animal Domestication." : Taming the Wild. National Geographic, Mar. 2011. Web. 21 Jan. 2015.

"What Is Quantitative Data? Definition and Meaning." BusinessDictionary.com. WebFinance, n.d. Web. 09 Jan. 2015.

Shmoop Editorial Team. "Qualitative v. Quantitative Data." Shmoop.com. Shmoop University, Inc., 11 Nov. 2008. Web. 09 Jan. 2015.

My Chosen Topic

I will be researching the domestication of animals. I will be researching this topic because I like animals and I am interested in the topic and the history of it and really any aspect of it. I am also interested in the history of animal domestication. My guiding question is: "What does the literature reveal about the domestication of animals?"

3 potential research topics

1-  What does literature say about genetic engineering today?

2- What does the literature reveal about the architectural abilities of the ancient Egyptians in regards to building the pyramids?

3- What does the literature say about the domestication of exotic animals?

Law enforcement and weed

In the article "when misguided cops turn the war on weed into a war on growing things," the author, Nick Wing, writes about how law enforcement messes up during drug busts due to miscalculations, and lists a number of stories confirming his thoughts.

The confirmation bias is the tendency to search for information which confirms one's beliefs. In this case, almost the whole article is written with the confirmation bias. Nick states his belief, that law enforcement should "hire a botanist" if they want to continue "cracking down" on weed, and for the remainder of the article, he provides research that he has found of stories in which there were wrongful fatalities, wrongful, and sometimes without a warrant, home searches, and many lawsuits as a result. In one, a family was held at gunpoint as the police checked their home, only to find a basement full of tomato pants and watermelon plants that the son and father had made, which, as anyone can imagine, led to a lawsuit. Nick found many stories such as this, yet he found none of success on the law enforcement's part.

 The base rate neglect bias is the tendency to ignore generic information and focus on specific information. In the article, Nick is talking about the same thing over and over again. The same drug; weed, the same basic idea; miss-identification of weed, and that is all he is focusing on. He could broaden his subject by telling a different story; all the ones he lists are essentially an innocent person or family is wrongfully accused of making/possessing weed, the "weed" ends up actually being some sort of marijuana look-alike, and the family/person sues. That is how he is using the base rate neglect bias.

In the article "when misguided cops turn the war on weed into a war on growing things," the author, Nick Wing, uses two biases that could affect the readers opinion on the topic; the confirmation bias, in which he only provides information confirming his opinion, and the base rate neglect bias, in which he narrows his subject matter down very narrow, and only focuses on specifics.

Peer Interview

Elise Cracco

If Elise could where only one color for the rest of her life, it would be"between blue or pink," because she looks good in those colors, but she would have to go with blue, because "there is so many different shades of blue." If she could move anywhere in the world for her choice of time, Elise would live in "Antarctica, just to say that I had that experience." I asked Elise what her opinion on Mr. Kefor was as a teacher, and she thinks that "He is really funny, and he teaches well." Elise has "technically, an older brother," but she says she was "an only child for the first eight years" of her life. I asked Elise if she was in a purge, what illegal things she would do: "I would rob a bank, to get money, and then I would use that money for whatever, then I would raid a convenient store and get all there food." Elise was born "in Providence Rhode Island, in Women and infants hospital. and  funny story, family friends, they have a son who is exactly a year older than me,and we were born in the same hospital by the same doctor." Elise say that the coolest place she has ever been is " Scotland, because they are so different, with there skirts and stuff." If Elise could be a fictional character for a day, she would be "Alice Cullen from the twilight series." Elise's opinion on school differs based on the time of day. " If I am just waking up in the morning, I am totally not for school, but when I am at school its OK, then when I get home I am like no, don't go back." Elise's favorite animal is a "giraffe, because they are so awkward, and disproportionate." That was my interview with Elise Cracco.

Incentives And aesthetics

A) Incentives motivate people to complete tasks. An incentive could be money, but that only works for tasks with a set of instructions. When people are asked to do tasks that require more thinking and work for large sums of money it does not help at all. It can help with a smaller sum of money and less thought involved in the task.

B) The most aesthetic experience in my life was when I went to Australia. My dad had a job interview there and his and my moms's tickets were free so we decided to make it a vacation. I was the most awesome place ever. The people were super friendly, which was a nice change, the animals were just like the best, the weather was absolutely perfect and the view from the hike up the blue mountains was unbelievable. And terrifying, but mostly unbelievable. Also the Sydney Opera House was so beautiful at night. That was the most aesthetic experience I have ever had.

My Bucket List

Short Term

• Graduate high school- This is definitely a short term goal for me, mostly because I am a freshman and I and already not a big fan, so it is probably going to suck trying to keep my grades up when most of my classes are really not that interesting.
• Do an exchange program-  I want to do an exchange program so that I can travel and become proficient in another language and really just experience new countries.
• Get better at horseback riding- I really like horses and I am around them with my sister a lot, who is really good at riding, and i still kind of stink, so I want to get better at that
• Meet my family on my dad's side-  I am half Iranian on my dad's side, and since all of his brothers and sisters and nieces and nephews live in Iran and it is really hard to visit there because of money and the government, I have never been able to meet them so that would be pretty cool.
• Learn how to do a headstand- I could never do a handstand, I would probably crack my skull, but I really want to be able to do a headstand.

Long Term

• GLADIATORS!!- So, this will most likely never happen and it might be a weird thing to put on a journalism assignment, but heck. So I think it would be super duper if I could go to the Colosseum in Rome and just watch a full out, roman clothes, gladiator fight. Like that would be pretty awesome. Just a thought.
• Dracula-  I am big on travel ever since I went to Australia, so I will travel anywhere I get the opportunity, and if I happen to find myself in Romania, I would love to visit Dracula's castle because I read the book and it was really good.
• JD ALL THE WAY- OK, I am totally Johnny Depp's biggest fan, and it is definitely on my bucket list to meet him, because he is legit the coolest person ever. And he wears pretty cool hats. So lets not forget that.
• Speak Russian-  Every time I hear Russian I'm like: wow, that is a boss language. And their accents are really awesome and hilarious and I really want to learn it sometime in the future.
• Disney World-  I have never been to Disney World, so it would be cool to go there but I really want to go to the one in Hong-Kong, because it would be really different and cool.

Sports In American Schools

       Although high-school sports can be beneficial to those who play, some changes need to be made in order to prioritize academics.In the article "The case against high-school sports," the author, Amanda Ripely, demonstrates the ups, and mostly downs, of mixing academics and sports.
      
     On one hand, sports can be a good thing for those students who do play. "Though the research on student athletes is mixed," Writes Amanda Ripely, "it generally suggests that sports do more good than harm for the players themselves." Studies show that "increases in the number of girls playing high-school sports have historically generated higher college attendance and employment rates among women," suggesting that sports gives athletes motivation to show up and do well so that they can play their sports.

       On the other hand, not many students do play sports, and their resources are being taken by the athletes: "But only 40 percent of seniors participate in high-school athletics, and whats harder to measure is how the overriding emphasis on sports affects everyone who doesn't play." Sports can be beneficial to the athletes themselves, but it affects the majority who do not play sports in a negative way, even bringing down their grades.

      Lastly, high-schools and colleges spend way too much money that could be spent on better teachers and for academics on sports equipment and coaches: "Each year, Spelman was spending $1 million on athletics-not for those students, but for the 4 percent of the student body that played sports." Schools with overweight and diabetic students spend their money on sports for the athletes, when they could be spending it on a gym or fitness center for all of the students, rather than just the athletes. Some schools thought sports were so important that they even took resources and even whole wings from the other students: "The elementary school hadn't employed a music teacher in years; and the high school had sealed off the science labs, which were infested with mold. Yet the high school still turned out football, basketball, volleyball, track, tennis, cheer-leading, and baseball teams each year." The high school had mold infested science labs, and still prioritized sports over academics.

     In conclusion, high schools and colleges should, without completely eliminating sports, focus more on improving their academic situations.


Ripely, Amanda. "The Case Against High-School Sports." The Atlantic Oct. 2013: 72-78. Print.   

Ethos

"I wasn't paddled until junior high. I couldn't tell you what my offense was. The principal offered me a choice between detention and "swats." The detention would have taken hours. The swats would be over in seconds. It was a no-brainer. I stood, as instructed, with my hands against a desk in the principal's office. I don't remember what I was hit with, how many times, or whether the principal did the deed. I wasn't looking."

Pathos

"Adrian Peterson, the NFL running back, has been indicted for injuring his 4-year-old son. According to sources in law enforcement, Peterson used a tree branch to discipline the boy, leaving cuts and bruises. Peterson's lawyer says his client meant no harm. "Adrian is a loving father who used his judgement as a parent to discipline his son," says the attorney."

Logos

"You start out thinking that you're going to teach your child a lesson. You talk, or you gesture, or you spank, or you withhold. You're trying to convey a message. But your kid doesn't focus on the message. He focuses on you. What he experiences is the talking, the gesturing, the spanking, or the withholding. That's what he learns. You're not an instructor. You're a model."

"The strongest predictor of whether a child thinks it's OK to hit kids, and whether he'll grow up to do so, is how often he's been disciplined that way. Light spanking isn't as bad as wielding a tree branch,. But it's part of the continuum. Researchers call this the "hidden curriculum." Corporal punishment teaches itself."


Article Link:
 http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/frame_game/2014/09/adrian_peterson_and_corporal_punishment_hitting_children_teaches_them_nothing.html

My Pet Peeves

My Pet Peeves

1. When people try and have conversations with me while I'm doing something else: Sometimes I will be watching TV or reading a book or doing my homework or really anything that takes up my attention, and when people decide that that would be a great moment to strike up conversation with me, it really bothers me, because I am clearly focused on something else. And even after they have tried to talk to me, and i reply with a grunt of sorts because I am really not focused on what they are saying, they get annoyed. Which just makes it double annoying for me.

2. When people respond to a question with, "sure.": When i ask someone a yes or no question, for example if they want to do something, and they say "sure," it really bothers me because it was a yes or no question, so you reply with yes, or no. When they reply with something other than yes or no, like sure, for example, I can tell you don't really want to but you just did not feel like expressing that.

3. When people text while we're hanging out: This would mostly apply to my older sister, but it is extremely frustrating when I am with her and she literally cannot physically put down her phone. Now, this is annoying even when we are not really doing much, but especially so when I am trying to talk to her, the reason being I have to repeat myself several times for what I said to actually register into her brain. 

4. When people sneeze loudly and unexpectedly: So I will just be sitting there, doing my thing, and suddenly, out of nowhere, a gargantuan noise erupts from someones face, shattering my unsuspecting ears and making me jump six feet. I really hate that.

5. When teachers correct you from "can" to "may": I hate it when i ask a teacher if i can go to the bathroom and they're like, "Uh, I don't know, can you?" And I'm just like ready to kick something and in my head I'm saying, "I don't know, can I? will you let me physically walk to the restroom?" But then I have to suck it up. So that is super annoying.